<big id="49bxd"><em id="49bxd"></em></big>

  1. <nav id="49bxd"><video id="49bxd"></video></nav>
  2. 您當前所在位置: 首頁 > 首發論文
    動態公開評議須知

    1. 評議人本著自愿的原則,秉持科學嚴謹的態度,從論文的科學性、創新性、表述性等方面給予客觀公正的學術評價,亦可對研究提出改進方案或下一步發展的建議。

    2. 論文若有勘誤表、修改稿等更新的版本,建議評議人針對最新版本的論文進行同行評議。

    3. 每位評議人對每篇論文有且僅有一次評議機會,評議結果將完全公示于網站上,一旦發布,不可更改、不可撤回,因此,在給予評議時請慎重考慮,認真對待,準確表述。

    4. 同行評議僅限于學術范圍內的合理討論,評議人需承諾此次評議不存在利益往來、同行競爭、學術偏見等行為,不可進行任何人身攻擊或惡意評價,一旦發現有不當評議的行為,評議結果將被撤銷,并收回評審人的權限,此外,本站將保留追究責任的權利。

    5. 論文所展示的星級為綜合評定結果,是根據多位評議人的同行評議結果進行綜合計算而得出的。

    勘誤表

    上傳勘誤表說明

    • 1. 請按本站示例的“勘誤表格式”要求,在文本框中編寫勘誤表;
    • 2. 本站只保留一版勘誤表,每重新上傳一次,即會覆蓋之前的版本;
    • 3. 本站只針對原稿進行勘誤,修改稿發布后,不可對原稿及修改稿再作勘誤。

    示例:

    勘誤表

    上傳勘誤表說明

    • 1. 請按本站示例的“勘誤表格式”要求,在文本框中編寫勘誤表;
    • 2. 本站只保留一版勘誤表,每重新上傳一次,即會覆蓋之前的版本;
    • 3. 本站只針對原稿進行勘誤,修改稿發布后,不可對原稿及修改稿再作勘誤。

    示例:

    上傳后印本

    ( 請提交PDF文檔 )

    * 后印本是指作者提交給期刊的預印本,經過同行評議和期刊的編輯后發表在正式期刊上的論文版本。作者自愿上傳,上傳前請查詢出版商所允許的延緩公示的政策,若因此產生糾紛,本站概不負責。

    發郵件給 王小芳 *

    收件人:

    收件人郵箱:

    發件人郵箱:

    發送內容:

    0/300

    論文收錄信息

    論文編號 202309-13
    論文題目 燃煤固廢重金屬分布特征與環境風險研究
    文獻類型
    收錄
    期刊

    上傳封面

    期刊名稱(中文)

    期刊名稱(英文)

    年, 卷(

    上傳封面

    書名(中文)

    書名(英文)

    出版地

    出版社

    出版年

    上傳封面

    書名(中文)

    書名(英文)

    出版地

    出版社

    出版年

    上傳封面

    編者.論文集名稱(中文) [c].

    出版地 出版社 出版年, -

    編者.論文集名稱(英文) [c].

    出版地出版社 出版年,-

    上傳封面

    期刊名稱(中文)

    期刊名稱(英文)

    日期--

    在線地址http://

    上傳封面

    文題(中文)

    文題(英文)

    出版地

    出版社,出版日期--

    上傳封面

    文題(中文)

    文題(英文)

    出版地

    出版社,出版日期--

    英文作者寫法:

    中外文作者均姓前名后,姓大寫,名的第一個字母大寫,姓全稱寫出,名可只寫第一個字母,其后不加實心圓點“.”,

    作者之間用逗號“,”分隔,最后為實心圓點“.”,

    示例1:原姓名寫法:Albert Einstein,編入參考文獻時寫法:Einstein A.

    示例2:原姓名寫法:李時珍;編入參考文獻時寫法:LI S Z.

    示例3:YELLAND R L,JONES S C,EASTON K S,et al.

    上傳修改稿說明:

    1.修改稿的作者順序及單位須與原文一致;

    2.修改稿上傳成功后,請勿上傳相同內容的論文;

    3.修改稿中必須要有相應的修改標記,如高亮修改內容,添加文字說明等,否則將作退稿處理。

    4.請選擇DOC或Latex中的一種文件格式上傳。

    上傳doc論文   請上傳模板編輯的DOC文件

    上傳latex論文

    * 上傳模板導出的pdf論文文件(須含頁眉)

    * 上傳模板編輯的tex文件

    回復成功!


    • 0

    燃煤固廢重金屬分布特征與環境風險研究

    首發時間:2023-09-04

    毛禮鑫 1    2   

    毛禮鑫(1994-),男,工程師,主要研究方向為煤系礦產資源勘探開發

    朱士飛 1    2   

    朱士飛,男,教授級高級工程師,主要研究方向為地質礦產勘查開發, 154432772@qq.com

    吳蒙 1    2    趙倩 3    王鵬程 4    秦云虎 1    2   
    • 1、江蘇地質礦產設計研究院,江蘇徐州 221006
    • 2、中國煤炭地質總局煤系礦產資源重點實驗室,江蘇徐州 221006
    • 3、江蘇省有色金屬華東地質勘查局,南京 210007
    • 4、兗礦能源集團股份有限公司濟寧二號煤礦,山東濟寧 272072

    摘要:The coal-fired solid waste from thermal power plants is produced in large quatity, and heavy metal pollution risk exists in accumulation treatment or resource utilization. In order to study the distribution characteristics of heavy metals in different coal-fired solid wastes and their effects on human health, the K power Plant in Jiangsu Province was taken as an example and the contents of heavy metals and major elements were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, atomic fluorescence spectrometer and X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. The results show that the content of heavy metal in coal-fired solid waste reduces in the order of Mn(859.51μg/g)> Cr(129.72μg/g)> Pb(87.37μg/g)> Cu(72.59)> Ni(38.81μg/g)> As(32.50μg/g)> Cd(0.42μg/g)> Hg(0.38μg/g). The distribution of Cu, Ni, Mn and Cr in various wastes decreases in the order of slag, coarse ash and fine ash, accounting for 29-60%, 22-41% and 17-33% respectively. However, the distribution of As, Hg, Cd and Pb exhibits an opposite trend, accounting for 1-8%, 36-41% and 51-61% in the slag, coarse ash and fine ash respectively. The enrichment of heavy metals is characterised by a "stepwise" pattern, which is affected by the element volatility, occurrence form and other chemical components. The evaluation results of potential ecological risk index showed that the comprehensive pollution level of fine ash was strong(RI = 428), among which Hg, As and Cd were the major contributing factors. The results of US EPA model evaluation show that the non-carcinogenic risk of heavy metals in coal solid waste is low, and the carcinogenic risk is in the acceptable range, among which Cr is the major contributing factor. Attention should be paid to Hg, As, Cd in fine ash and Cr in slag during the prevention and control of heavy metals and the resource utilization of solid waste.

    關鍵詞: coal-fired products; fly ash; heavy metals; environmental risk

    For information in English, please click here

    Distribution and environmental risk assessment of heavy metals in coal-fired products of power plants

    MAO Lixin 1    2   

    毛禮鑫(1994-),男,工程師,主要研究方向為煤系礦產資源勘探開發

    ZHU Shifei 1    2   

    朱士飛,男,教授級高級工程師,主要研究方向為地質礦產勘查開發, 154432772@qq.com

    WU Meng 1    2    ZHAO Qian 3    Wang Pengcheng 4    QIN Yunhu 1    2   
    • 1、Jiangsu Design Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China
    • 2、CNACG Key Laboratory of Mineral Resource in Coal Measures, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China
    • 3、East China Mineral Exploration and Development Bureau,Nanjing 210007,China
    • 4、Jining No.3 Coal Mine, Yankuang Energy Group Company Limited, Jining, Shandong 272072, China

    Abstract:The coal-fired solid waste from thermal power plants is produced in large quatity, and heavy metal pollution risk exists in accumulation treatment or resource utilization. In order to study the distribution characteristics of heavy metals in different coal-fired solid wastes and their effects on human health, the K power Plant in Jiangsu Province was taken as an example and the contents of heavy metals and major elements were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, atomic fluorescence spectrometer and X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. The results show that the content of heavy metal in coal-fired solid waste reduces in the order of Mn(859.51μg/g)> Cr(129.72μg/g)> Pb(87.37μg/g)> Cu(72.59)> Ni(38.81μg/g)> As(32.50μg/g)> Cd(0.42μg/g)> Hg(0.38μg/g). The distribution of Cu, Ni, Mn and Cr in various wastes decreases in the order of slag, coarse ash and fine ash, accounting for 29-60%, 22-41% and 17-33% respectively. However, the distribution of As, Hg, Cd and Pb exhibits an opposite trend, accounting for 1-8%, 36-41% and 51-61% in the slag, coarse ash and fine ash respectively. The enrichment of heavy metals is characterised by a "stepwise" pattern, which is affected by the element volatility, occurrence form and other chemical components. The evaluation results of potential ecological risk index showed that the comprehensive pollution level of fine ash was strong(RI = 428), among which Hg, As and Cd were the major contributing factors. The results of US EPA model evaluation show that the non-carcinogenic risk of heavy metals in coal solid waste is low, and the carcinogenic risk is in the acceptable range, among which Cr is the major contributing factor. Attention should be paid to Hg, As, Cd in fine ash and Cr in slag during the prevention and control of heavy metals and the resource utilization of solid waste.

    Keywords: coal-fired products fly ash heavy metals environmental risk

    Click to fold

    點擊收起

    論文圖表:

    引用

    導出參考文獻

    .txt .ris .doc
    毛禮鑫,朱士飛,吳蒙,等. 燃煤固廢重金屬分布特征與環境風險研究[EB/OL]. 北京:中國科技論文在線 [2023-09-04]. http://www.maigrir-regime-musculation.com/releasepaper/content/202309-13.

    No.****

    同行評議

    未申請同行評議

    評論

    全部評論

    0/1000

    勘誤表

    燃煤固廢重金屬分布特征與環境風險研究

    国产精品一级毛片不收费

    <big id="49bxd"><em id="49bxd"></em></big>

    1. <nav id="49bxd"><video id="49bxd"></video></nav>